This is a thought that has occurred within me a couple of times, as Zoo recently celebrated his 100th article, and Capt. Cornbread just wrote his 150th the other day. I'm wondering, honestly, does that number make it an important article? Because some 100th and 200th and 25th articles stink on ice. I mean honestly... really look at them. They suck. (Not Brandon or Shaun, by the way, but some 100th, 25th, ect. articles really stink!)
This will be my *gasp* *shock-and-awe* 90th article. Big whoop. It's not going to be good, since I'm complaining about other people celebrating a number of articles. Lots of members of the JU community have hundreds of articles more than me. That's just a fact of life. Some people have the dedication to post 3-4 articles a day, while some of us get 2-3 out a week, if we're lucky and not on vacation (more about Disney soon, keep your ears perked up!).
If it's a number you feel worth celebrating, shouldn't the article be one worth celebrating as well?
Just some food for thought.
Beebes